AI at Work

Gamma finds slower workflows drive higher user conversion

Gamma’s A/B testing revealed that interactive, slower workflows lead to higher user satisfaction and paid conversion than fast modes. The company now restricts fast mode to new mobile users, emphasizing the value of human-in-the-loop friction.

· 1 source · User experience insights

Gamma conducted an A/B test on a 'fast mode' feature designed to skip intermediate steps like outline review and user questions to reduce friction. Contrary to the hypothesis that speed would increase satisfaction, the test revealed that users who went through the slower, more interactive process reported higher satisfaction, invested more time in editing, and converted to paid subscriptions at a higher rate. John Narona, of Gamma, attributes this to the 'speed bumps' fostering a sense of investment in the output. Gamma now ships fast mode only for new mobile users. Narona also describes the rise of the 'marketing engineer,' a role blending data science and creative execution, where individuals use AI agents to run dozens of experiments daily. He notes that Gamma users are increasingly building automations that connect Salesforce deal opportunities to automatic pitch deck generation via tools like N8N or Zapier. This indicates a shift toward AI-native operational workflows in B2B contexts, where friction and human oversight remain critical for retention in subjective creative domains.