Company Profile

ChatGPT

1.7
Avg Sentiment

Sentiment Over Time

Analysis Timeline

1.0
Score
2026-03-17

"Referenced as a widely recognized LLM, often compared to Co-pilot in the timeline of AI product releases and its impact on user behavior."

-3.0
Score
2026-03-13

"Was flagged regarding a shooter's behavior and did not report it, leading to a lawsuit; also shown to assist in planning violent attacks."

3.0
Score
2026-03-12

"Recommended as an AI tool for brand ideation and synthetic market research, indicating its practical business applications."

5.0
Score
2026-03-10

"Biggest AI product, clear winner in usage, building towards a Google-like "AI for everyone" model with various monetization strategies, and developing compounding advantages through authentication and group chats."

-1.0
Score
2026-03-07

"Downloads are being surpassed by Claude's app in some metrics, indicating a relative slowdown or loss of market share in certain segments."

-2.0
Score
2026-03-04

"Its generated passwords were found to exhibit predictable patterns, making them vulnerable to automated cracking."

3.0
Score
2026-03-04

"Provided critical emotional support and life-changing advice to an individual in crisis, demonstrating its profound personal impact, despite expert concerns regarding general-purpose AI for therapy."

0.0
Score
2026-02-26

"Cited as an example of a general-purpose AI tool being used by teenagers for emotional support, with mental health professionals expressing concerns about its suitability for such uses."

4.0
Score
2026-02-26

"Widely used for generalist tasks, data analysis, learning new skills (e.g., Postgres), and generating marketing content."

1.0
Score
2026-02-23

"Mentioned for its web-based memory, but implicitly contrasted as less effective for structured, controllable context management compared to Obsidian-integrated agents."

-2.0
Score
2026-02-19

"Criticized for its repetitive language, context loss, hallucination, and 'oberlehrerhaft' tone in general use, contrasting with more structured AI tools."

4.0
Score
2026-02-18

"Identified as a catalyst that enabled Kavak to leverage its existing data ontology for building advanced AI agents for customer interactions."

1.0
Score
2026-02-17

"Discussed as a powerful AI tool widely used by students for various tasks including homework, prompting discussions on its impact on learning, data privacy, and potential for misuse."

3.0
Score
2026-02-15

"Highlighted as a key AI tool changing how buyers research products and its role in the future of go-to-market strategies."

4.0
Score
2026-02-11

"Facilitates deep emotional connections, provides companionship, and inspires creative output for users like Calder, leading to significant personal benefits."

4.0
Score
2026-02-09

"Catalyst for market shifts, price increases, and example of high-priced AI consumer product."

4.0
Score
2026-02-04

"Cited as a benchmark for generative AI's capabilities, particularly in comparison to other models, and its role in sparking the generative AI moment."

3.0
Score
2026-02-02

"Mentioned as a leading competitor, a benchmark for GenAI, and its limitations in cost and language support in emerging markets are highlighted, but its overall influence is acknowledged."

-2.0
Score
2026-01-31

"Cited as an example of LLM assistance that negatively impacts human cognitive function and memory."

4.0
Score
2026-01-29

"Mentioned as a pivotal moment for AI, demonstrating creative capabilities and driving rapid advancements, though quickly replicated by competitors."

3.0
Score
2026-01-27

"Used as a benchmark for excitement about new AI technology, indicating positive sentiment towards its capabilities."

0.0
Score
2026-01-26

"Mentioned as a comparable AI tool, providing context for Nebula's unique capabilities without a specific positive or negative sentiment."

← Back to Companies Index