Strategic Product Sunsetting: Why Killing Darlings Drives Growth
Learn why discontinuing stable but stagnant products is crucial for innovation and growth, even when they're profitable, to free up vital resources.
Key Insights
-
Insight
Products can exhibit "zombie-like" behavior, being stable and profitable but lacking growth, which can mask a suboptimal product-market fit or a market that is too small.
Impact
Misallocating resources on stable but stagnant products can hinder genuine growth and innovation by preventing investment in more promising ventures.
-
Insight
Maintaining mediocre or flatlining products incurs significant opportunity costs, diverting resources (time, team, capital) from potential high-growth experiments and new product development.
Impact
Organizations risk being outpaced by competitors if they continuously invest in low-impact products instead of seeking new, impactful opportunities.
-
Insight
The decision to sunset a product is often difficult due to established revenue streams and dedicated teams, requiring a willingness to accept short-term revenue hits for potential long-term gains.
Impact
Hesitation to cut profitable but stagnant products can lead to a portfolio filled with "good enough" offerings, impeding overall business transformation and adaptability.
-
Insight
Effective product portfolio management, such as the McKinsey H1, H2, H3 horizon model, helps categorize products by their growth potential and maturity, facilitating strategic transitions and replacements.
Impact
A clear portfolio strategy enables businesses to proactively manage product lifecycles, ensuring a continuous pipeline of future growth drivers to replace aging products.
-
Insight
Product sunsetting decisions should be made at a portfolio level, often one step above the direct product team, to ensure objectivity and minimize emotional attachment or perception of failure by the team.
Impact
Centralizing sunsetting decisions prevents individual teams from clinging to products and ensures resource reallocation aligns with broader strategic objectives, mitigating internal conflict.
-
Insight
Normalizing the concept of product lifecycles, acknowledging that all products eventually run their course, can reduce the trauma associated with sunsetting and foster a culture of continuous adaptation.
Impact
A culture that embraces product lifecycles encourages experimentation and reduces fear of "failure," making the organization more agile and resilient to market shifts.
Key Quotes
"The problem is all the time that we spend on that product, we're not spending on experiments to find a product that could grow at the rate that we want and could satisfy our customers better."
"I have a product that is flatlining, it's not growing, it's stable. There's some dips sometimes that makes it not stable, but it was very profitable. Um, but I want to make time and space for what's next and what's better product market fit for both direct to consumers and for B2B."
"We need to normalize all products, even wildly successful products, have a life cycle, and by definition, a life cycle has an ending, like it is normal to sunset products, and like that should be a part of the conversation."
Summary
The Strategic Imperative: When to "Kill Your Darlings" in Business
In the dynamic world of business and entrepreneurship, leaders often face a counter-intuitive challenge: knowing when to discontinue products or services that are stable, even profitable, but no longer exhibiting growth or desired impact. This strategic move, often termed "killing your darlings," is critical for fostering true innovation and sustained expansion.
The Peril of "Good Enough" Products
Many businesses find themselves with products that have some customer base, generate revenue, and receive positive feedback, yet fail to achieve significant growth. This "zombie company" or "limping along" scenario can create a false sense of product-market fit. While customers may be satisfied, the market might be too small, or the product simply isn't resonating enough to scale. This middle ground is particularly dangerous, as it appears successful enough to avoid outright termination but drains resources that could be better utilized elsewhere.
The Opportunity Cost of Stagnation
The most significant impact of holding onto mediocre products is the profound opportunity cost. Every hour, every team, and every dollar invested in a stagnant product is an hour, team, and dollar not spent on discovering and nurturing genuinely transformative opportunities. As one expert noted, "The problem is all the time that we spend on that product, we're not spending on experiments to find a product that could grow at the rate that we want and could satisfy our customers better." This resource trap prevents businesses from making bold bets and pivoting towards future market demands, such as integrating emerging technologies like AI.
Navigating Organizational Hurdles
Implementing a "kill your darlings" strategy within larger organizations presents unique challenges. Dedicated product teams become deeply invested, and the prospect of reallocating personnel or taking a revenue hit can be daunting. The decision to sunset a product, even a profitable one, requires courage and a belief in the potential for greater returns from new ventures. This is a portfolio-level decision, not just a team-level one, to prevent demotivation and ensure strategic alignment.
Strategic Solutions for Sustainable Growth
To navigate these complexities, businesses should: * Regularly evaluate their product portfolio: Identify products that are flatlining or not meeting growth objectives. * Adopt a structured approach to sunsetting: Implement a "sunsetting column" or process to facilitate discussions and planning for product discontinuation. * Utilize portfolio models: Employ frameworks like McKinsey's H1, H2, H3 (Horizon) model to categorize current revenue streams, near-term investments, and long-term bold bets, ensuring a pipeline of future growth. * Cultivate a culture that normalizes product lifecycles: Understand that all products, even successful ones, have an end. This reframes sunsetting not as failure, but as successful navigation through a product's life course and an adaptation to evolving market conditions.
By embracing the difficult but necessary act of discontinuing underperforming products, businesses can free up crucial resources, empower innovation, and strategically position themselves for sustained, impactful growth. This proactive approach ensures that the organization remains agile and responsive to market shifts, rather than being held back by past successes.
Action Items
Conduct regular, objective portfolio reviews to identify products that are stable and profitable but no longer exhibiting desired growth or market impact.
Impact: This proactive evaluation prevents prolonged resource allocation to underperforming assets, freeing up capacity for more strategic initiatives.
Implement a "sunsetting" process or dedicated column in product management workflows to formally discuss and plan the discontinuation or transformation of underperforming products.
Impact: A structured process institutionalizes the discussion around product retirement, making it a regular business practice rather than an ad-hoc, reactive measure.
Adopt a multi-horizon portfolio strategy (e.g., H1, H2, H3 model) to manage current successes, emerging opportunities, and long-term strategic bets, ensuring a pipeline for future growth.
Impact: This framework provides a clear roadmap for resource allocation, allowing the business to balance current profitability with future innovation and market relevance.
Elevate product discontinuation decisions to a higher, portfolio-level management layer to ensure objectivity and alignment with overarching business strategy, rather than leaving it solely to individual product teams.
Impact: This ensures that difficult but necessary decisions are made with a broader strategic perspective, optimizing resource deployment across the entire organization.
Foster an organizational culture that views product lifecycles and eventual sunsetting as a normal, healthy part of business evolution, rather than a sign of failure.
Impact: This cultural shift reduces team demotivation, encourages continuous innovation, and increases the organization's agility in responding to market changes.
Be prepared to absorb a short-term revenue reduction when sunsetting profitable but stagnant products, viewing it as an investment in discovering and developing higher-growth opportunities.
Impact: This strategic mindset allows the business to make bold, forward-looking decisions, ultimately leading to greater long-term profitability and market leadership.