Navigating the New War Economy: Geopolitics and Business Survival

Navigating the New War Economy: Geopolitics and Business Survival

bto – der Ökonomie-Podcast von Dr. Daniel Stelter Jan 25, 2026 german 5 min read

The global economy has shifted from peace to a 'war economy', driven by geopolitical conflicts and strategic dependencies. Europe faces critical challenges amid US-China rivalry.

Key Insights

  • Insight

    The global economy has transitioned from a 'peace economy' driven by consumer demand to a 'war economy' characterized by production bottlenecks, strategic dependencies, and geopolitical mistrust since 2022.

    Impact

    Businesses must fundamentally re-evaluate their operational models, supply chain strategies, and market assumptions, as demand-side economics are superseded by supply-side vulnerabilities and political considerations.

  • Insight

    China has strategically weaponized its industrial capacity and control over critical supply chain bottlenecks, like rare earths, to gain geopolitical leverage against the US and other nations.

    Impact

    This necessitates diversification of critical resource sourcing and manufacturing bases for Western companies to mitigate risks of supply disruptions and geopolitical coercion.

  • Insight

    Europe is at risk of 'Yemenization,' becoming a battleground or collateral damage between the US and China due to its perceived technological naiveté, aging population, and lack of cohesive strategic autonomy.

    Impact

    European businesses face heightened geopolitical risks and must prepare for increased competition and potential market fragmentation as global powers vie for influence, potentially at Europe's expense.

  • Insight

    The European car industry's decline, driven by Chinese subsidized EV exports, threatens not just automotive jobs but also the continent's entire technological base and R&D investment.

    Impact

    This industrial erosion could lead to significant job losses, a decline in European innovation capacity, and increased reliance on foreign technology, undermining long-term economic sovereignty.

  • Insight

    The traditional ESG framework is insufficient for the 'war economy' and needs redefinition to prioritize energy security, defense, and industrial resilience over climate-only goals.

    Impact

    Companies will need to shift investment priorities and risk assessments to include geopolitical stability, national security, and strategic autonomy, potentially altering investment flows and project feasibility.

  • Insight

    Germany possesses a unique financial capacity (1 trillion euros) to strategically invest in its future, analogous to China in 2009 post-subprime crisis, offering a chance for industrial renewal.

    Impact

    If invested wisely in productive assets like raw material sovereignty, defense, and technology, this capital could rebuild Germany's and potentially Europe's industrial strength; if misspent on social programs, it risks being wasted.

Key Quotes

""We find ourselves, and have been for some time, no longer in a peace economy, but in a war economy.""
""If you destroy the European car industry, you destroy the semiconductor industry, the European semiconductor industry, and effectively you write off Europe from the technological map of the 21st century.""
""We are the only place among the developed countries where you have both the freedom of thinking and freedom of acting. We are the only [such] industrial nation... and the problem we are wasting it.""

Summary

The Dawn of the War Economy: A New Reality for Global Business

The global economic landscape has fundamentally transformed, moving from an era of "peace economy" to a "war economy." This shift, marked by events like Russia's aggression in Ukraine and China's strategic consolidation of power, redefines the rules of engagement for businesses and nations alike. No longer solely driven by consumer demand, the new economy is shaped by production bottlenecks, strategic dependencies, and a rising tide of mistrust.

The Geopolitical Chessboard: US-China Rivalry and Europe's Predicament

At the heart of this transformation is the escalating rivalry between the United States and China. China, with its long-term strategic vision, has systematically invested in industrial capabilities and control over critical supply chains, such as rare earths. This foresight has allowed China to weaponize its manufacturing supremacy, challenging US hegemony and aiming for "equal-to-equal" status. For Europe, this dynamic presents a perilous challenge. Sandwiched between these two economic superpowers, Europe risks becoming a "Yemen" – a battleground where larger powers wage their conflicts, exploiting a region perceived as technologically stagnant, rich, and naive.

Europe's Industrial Crossroads: The Auto Industry and Energy Costs

Europe's industrial base, particularly its automotive sector, is under direct assault. China's heavily subsidized electric vehicle industry, far from being just a technological leap, is a deliberate strategic move to dismantle the heart of the European economy. Losing the car industry would not only be an economic blow but could effectively "write off Europe from the technological map of the 21st century." Exacerbating this is Europe's energy policy, which, unlike China's pursuit of energy autarky, often leads to high costs, further undermining industrial competitiveness. The existing ESG framework, focused on environmental, social, and governance factors, is deemed insufficient for this new reality, requiring a radical redefinition to prioritize energy security and defense.

Charting a Path Forward: Strategic Imperatives for Survival

To navigate this treacherous environment, Europe, and particularly Germany with its unique financial capacity, must undertake fundamental changes. The immediate imperative is to protect and rebuild its industrial base, strategically investing in raw material sovereignty, defense capabilities, and technological independence. This demands a shift from current spending priorities, which often favor social welfare, towards productive, long-term investments. Companies, too, must adapt by appointing "Geopolitical Risk Officers" to review and diversify sourcing, enhance supply chain resilience, and build unprecedented production flexibility. A "China Plus One" strategy – engaging with China's private sector and local economies while reducing reliance on Beijing's central government – offers a nuanced approach. Ultimately, Europe must activate its own single market to foster internal growth, reduce external dependencies, and reclaim its agency in a world increasingly defined by economic warfare.

Action Items

European nations must protect and restore their industrial base by prioritizing strategic investments in raw material sovereignty, defense capabilities, and technological independence.

Impact: This would reduce critical dependencies, strengthen economic resilience, and enhance Europe's leverage in global geopolitical negotiations.

Companies should appoint 'Geopolitical Risk Officers' to review and diversify sourcing, enhance supply chain resilience through long-term contracts and transparency, and build flexible production capabilities.

Impact: This proactive risk management will mitigate disruptions, ensure continuity of operations, and adapt business models to the volatile geopolitical landscape.

Europe must aggressively activate and reform its internal single market to foster domestic economic growth, reduce reliance on external powers, and increase intra-European trade efficiency.

Impact: This internal strengthening can create a more robust economic bloc, making Europe less susceptible to external pressures and more competitive globally.

Develop a 'China Plus One' strategy that differentiates between the Chinese government's objectives and the interests of China's private sector, local municipalities, and younger generations.

Impact: This nuanced approach allows for continued, albeit de-risked, engagement with parts of the Chinese economy while reducing dependency on Beijing's strategic industrial policies.

Germany should strategically invest its significant financial reserves (1 trillion euros) in productive assets that build long-term industrial strength and strategic autonomy, rather than social welfare programs.

Impact: Such targeted investment could catalyze a resurgence in German and European industrial competitiveness, securing future economic prosperity and geopolitical influence.

Mentioned Companies

Mentioned positively as a German company positioned to benefit from increased defense spending and strategic raw material procurement in the context of the 'war economy'.

Tags

Keywords

War Economy Business Impact Europe Geopolitical Strategy US China Economic Conflict Supply Chain Weaponization Rare Earths Geopolitics Germany Strategic Investment ESG Redefinition Industrial Autonomy European Car Industry Future Corporate Geopolitical Risk